From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Harris v. Walker

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Apr 14, 2021
320 So. 3d 232 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021)

Opinion

No. 3D20-30

04-14-2021

Quanisha HARRIS, Appellant, v. Carolyn WALKER, etc., Appellee.

Peter A. Cohen, P.A., and Peter A. Cohen ; Wasson & Associates, Chartered, and Roy D. Wasson, for appellant. Marva L. Wiley, for appellee.


Peter A. Cohen, P.A., and Peter A. Cohen ; Wasson & Associates, Chartered, and Roy D. Wasson, for appellant.

Marva L. Wiley, for appellee.

Before LOGUE, SCALES, and LOBREE, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

"The lower court's ultimate factual determinations during a non-jury trial may not be disturbed on appeal unless shown to be unsupported by competent and substantial evidence or to constitute an abuse of discretion." Mia. Real Estate Inv., LLC v. Beini Xu, 252 So. 3d 292, 293 (Fla. 3d DCA 2018). Additionally, without a transcript, and in the absence of fundamental error on its face, an appellate court must affirm a trial court's decision. See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So. 2d 1150, 1152 (Fla. 1979) ("Without a record of the trial proceedings, the appellate court can not properly resolve the underlying factual issues so as to conclude that the trial court's judgment is not supported by the evidence or by an alternative theory.").

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Harris v. Walker

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Apr 14, 2021
320 So. 3d 232 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021)
Case details for

Harris v. Walker

Case Details

Full title:Quanisha Harris, Appellant, v. Carolyn Walker, etc., Appellee.

Court:Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

Date published: Apr 14, 2021

Citations

320 So. 3d 232 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021)