Opinion
1:23CV63-GHD-DAS
11-30-2023
AMY E. HARRIS PLAINTIFF v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, ON BEHALF OF RURAL HOUSING SERVICES, FORMERLY FARMERS HOME ADMINISTRATION; N. CHAD BORDEN, SUBSTITUTE TRUSTEE; KIRSTEN FITZGERALD; AND JOHN DOES 1-5 DEFENDANTS
ORDER OF DISMISSAL AND CLOSING CASE
Presently before the Court is Plaintiff's Motion to Dismiss Non-Govemment Defendants and Claims [23]. Plaintiff requests that this Court dismiss her claims against N. Chad Borden, Kirsten Fitzgerald, and John Does 1-5, without prejudice, following the Court's previous Order [22] granting the United States' Motion to Dismiss. Plaintiff Harris states that the claims against these Defendants are due to be dismissed. The Court finds the motion to be well taken and that the claims against the remaining Defendants shall be dismissed.
Therefore, the Plaintiffs Motion to Dismiss [23] is GRANTED and the remaining claims against Defendants N. Chad Borden, Kirsten Fitzgerald, and John Does 1-5 are DISMISSED. As no claims remain against any Defendant in this action, this case CLOSED.
SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED.