From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Harris v. United States

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Oct 21, 2022
2:22-cv-00022-JCM-VCF (D. Nev. Oct. 21, 2022)

Opinion

2:22-cv-00022-JCM-VCF

10-21-2022

George Harris, Plaintiff, v. United States of America, Defendant.

BENJAMIN MILLER, ESQ. ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF BLAINE WELSH ASSISTANT UNITED STATES ATTORNEY ATTORNEYS FOR THE UNITED STATES


BENJAMIN MILLER, ESQ. ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF

BLAINE WELSH ASSISTANT UNITED STATES ATTORNEY ATTORNEYS FOR THE UNITED STATES

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DISCOVERY DEADLINES (SECOND REQUEST)

CAM FERENBACH UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to LR IA 6-1 and LR 26-3, the parties request a 90-day extension of discovery deadlines as, and for the reasons, set forth below. This stipulation is filed at least 21 days before the earliest deadline sought to be extended, i.e., the deadline to amend/add parties and submit initial expert disclosures.

DISCOVERY COMPLETED

To date, the Parties have engaged in the following discovery:

• Plaintiff made his initial disclosures on July 7, 2022.
• Defendant made its initial disclosures on May 24, 2022.
• Defendant has propounded interrogatories and requests for production of documents to Plaintiff, responses which are pending.
• Plaintiff has propounded interrogatories, requests for admission and requests for production of documents to Defendant. Defendant responded to the requests for admissions, however, responses to the interrogatories and requests for production of documents are pending.

DISCOVERY REMAINING

Discovery has been proceeding in the normal course. However, with AUSA Holly Vance's recent injury and surgery (further explained below), discovery has been delayed. In particular, depositions of VA employees, Michael Mallory, Midyorri Damalerio, and Peter Shubin were set for October 24, 25 and 28, 2022, but have been postponed. They will be rescheduled for future dates and times (likely in mid to late December). Defendant will also likely take the deposition of Plaintiff. Plaintiff and Defendant may also agree to a Rule 35 examination, if so desired by Defendant.

Plaintiff will respond to the interrogatories and requests for production of documents. Defendant will use such discovery responses and HIPAA forms to collect medical records from Plaintiff's providers. Defendant will respond to the Plaintiff's interrogatories and requests for production of documents.

Expert disclosures and depositions remain to be completed. The Parties expect they will retain and disclose multiple experts in this medical malpractice case. In order for the experts to have all evidence available to provide timely reports, the Parties will need an additional 90 days.

The parties reserve the right to engage in other any discovery permitted by applicable rule and within the revised discovery deadlines if the Court approves this stipulation.

WHY REMAINING DISCOVERY HAS NOT BEEN COMPLETED

An extension is warranted because AUSA Holly Vance, who is assigned to defend this case, was injured in an accident on October 2, 2022. Based on the information available, AUSA Vance will not be able to resume discovery matters in this case until November 14, 2022, at the earliest. She had surgery on Friday, October 14, 2022 and will be in recovery for an estimated 4-6 weeks. Further, all attorneys in the Civil Division of the U.S. Attorney's Office are handling a much higher workload than normal. From December 18, 2021 until now, four of the 14 attorneys in the civil division have left the office. Two more attorneys in the civil division will be transferring to other U.S. Attorney's Offices by the end of 2022. Given those vacancies and the increased workloads, the undersigned AUSA is unaware of any AUSA who could step into this case and proceed with discovery in this case before mid-November 2022, at the earliest.

In light of the above, the parties' counsel conferred and agreed that a 90-day extension would be proper in order to ensure that the parties can complete fact discovery, obtain needed medical records and give time to experts so they can provide timely reports and opinions. The parties agree that neither party will be prejudiced by the proposed extension, and that they may be prejudiced should the current schedule remain in place. The parties agree the extension is sought in good faith.

EXTENSION OF THE DISCOVERY PLAN AND SCHEDULING ORDER

The following table sets forth the current deadlines and the proposed extended deadlines that are the subject of this stipulated request:

SCHEDULED EVENT

CURRENT DEADLINE

PROPOSED DEADLINE

Amend or Add Parties

March 14, 2023

June 12, 2023

Initial Expert Disclosure

March 14, 2023

June 12, 2023

Rebuttal Expert Disclosure

April 14, 2023

July 13, 2023

Discovery Cutoff

June 14, 2023

September 12, 2023

Dispositive Motions

July 14, 2023

October 12, 2023

Proposed Joint Pretrial Order

August 14, 2023

November 13, 2023

However, if dispositive motions were to be filed, the deadline for the Proposed Joint Pretrial Order would be deferred until 30 days after the Court rules on the dispositive motions.

This request for an extension of time is not sought for any improper purpose including delay. This is the second request for an extension of discovery deadlines in this matter.

IT ISSOORDERED.


Summaries of

Harris v. United States

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Oct 21, 2022
2:22-cv-00022-JCM-VCF (D. Nev. Oct. 21, 2022)
Case details for

Harris v. United States

Case Details

Full title:George Harris, Plaintiff, v. United States of America, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, District of Nevada

Date published: Oct 21, 2022

Citations

2:22-cv-00022-JCM-VCF (D. Nev. Oct. 21, 2022)