From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Harris v. United States

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Jan 27, 2016
Civil Action No. 15-2170 (RDM) (D.D.C. Jan. 27, 2016)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 15-2170 (RDM)

01-27-2016

RONNIE LIONEL HARRIS, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES, Respondent.


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

Petitioner Ronnie Lionel Harris, proceeding pro se, filed this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. He is incarcerated at the Hazelton United States Penitentiary in Bruceton Mills, West Virginia. Harris contends, mistakenly, that "[t]his case comes . . . via remand from the United States Court of Appeals." Dkt. 1 at 1 (Pet. ¶ 2). He is referring to the D.C. Circuit's remand in a separate civil case, Harris v. Fulwood, No. 12-1215 (ABJ), which instructed the district court only "to modify the orders to state that dismissal is without prejudice to Appellant's rights to pursue his claims in an appropriate proceeding," in accordance with Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477 (1994). Harris v. Fulwood, No. 13-5343, at 2 (D.C. Cir. Apr. 21, 2015).

The instant habeas petition is not a continuation of Harris's civil action in case No. 12-1215. Rather, it is based on the same claim of actual innocence that Harris raised in a prior habeas action, and it compels the same result. See Harris v. United States, No. 15-1425, 2015 WL 8664189 (D.D.C. Dec. 11, 2015) (explaining that "a federal court in the District of Columbia lacks jurisdiction to grant habeas relief from a Maryland conviction," and any challenge to the U.S. Parole Commission's reliance on the Maryland conviction "must proceed under the general habeas statute . . . before a district judge who is capable of exercising personal jurisdiction over the warden of the prison where [the petitioner] is detained").

Because this Court lacks jurisdiction to consider Harris's habeas petition, it is hereby ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED without prejudice.

SO ORDERED. The Clerk shall enter judgment and shall mail a copy of this Memorandum Opinion and Order to the petitioner at the address reflected on the docket.

/s/ Randolph D. Moss

RANDOLPH D. MOSS

United States District Judge Date: January 27 2016


Summaries of

Harris v. United States

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Jan 27, 2016
Civil Action No. 15-2170 (RDM) (D.D.C. Jan. 27, 2016)
Case details for

Harris v. United States

Case Details

Full title:RONNIE LIONEL HARRIS, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Date published: Jan 27, 2016

Citations

Civil Action No. 15-2170 (RDM) (D.D.C. Jan. 27, 2016)