From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Harris v. United States

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Apr 23, 2014
2014-5044 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 23, 2014)

Opinion

2014-5044

04-23-2014

WILLIAM OSCAR HARRIS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee.


NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

Appeal from the United States Court of Federal Claims in No. 1:13-cv-00824-LJB, Judge Lynn J. Bush.

ON MOTION


PER CURIAM.


ORDER

The United States moves to dismiss William Oscar Harris's appeal for lack of jurisdiction. Mr. Harris opposes. Mr. Harris moves for leave to file his reply brief and for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. The United States opposes.

The United States Court of Federal Claims has stayed discovery in Mr. Harris's case while it considers the government's pending motion to dismiss. It has not issued any final decision pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1295(a)(3). While Mr. Harris argues that this court possesses jurisdiction pursuant 9 U.S.C. § 16(a)(1)(A), he has not established the right to file an interlocutory appeal under the Federal Arbitration Act. There is no evidence that a contract containing an arbitration clause is at issue here.

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) The motion to dismiss is granted.

(2) All other motions are moot.

(3) Each side shall bear its own costs.

FOR THE COURT

__________

Daniel E. O'Toole

Clerk of Court
s24


Summaries of

Harris v. United States

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Apr 23, 2014
2014-5044 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 23, 2014)
Case details for

Harris v. United States

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM OSCAR HARRIS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES…

Court:United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Date published: Apr 23, 2014

Citations

2014-5044 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 23, 2014)

Citing Cases

Harris v. United States

We also rejected the contention that Mr. Harris could appeal under the Federal Arbitration Act, 9 U.S.C. §…