From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Harris v. State

Supreme Court of Florida
Feb 7, 2006
924 So. 2d 808 (Fla. 2006)

Opinion

Case No. SC05-1641.

February 7, 2006.

Lower Tribunal No. 2D04-5798.


Petitioner filed a petition for a writ of mandamus. To the extent that the petition requests that this Court compel the Second District Court of Appeal to reinstate the petition for a writ of mandamus in Case No. 2D04-5798, the petitioner has failed to demonstrate a clear legal right to the relief requested. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See Huffman v. State, 813 So. 2d 10, 11 (Fla. 2000) (holding that in order to be entitled to a writ of mandamus, the petitioner must show that he has a clear legal right to performance of the requested act, that the respondent has an indisputable legal duty to perform that act, and that no other adequate remedy exists).

To the extent that the petition requests other relief, the petition is denied without prejudice.

WELLS, ANSTEAD, QUINCE, CANTERO and BELL, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Harris v. State

Supreme Court of Florida
Feb 7, 2006
924 So. 2d 808 (Fla. 2006)
Case details for

Harris v. State

Case Details

Full title:GREGORY HARRIS, Petitioner(s) v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent(s)

Court:Supreme Court of Florida

Date published: Feb 7, 2006

Citations

924 So. 2d 808 (Fla. 2006)

Citing Cases

Lockhart v. Crews

2010) (table decision) (petition for review dismissed); Lockhart v. State, 43 So.3d 690 (Fla.2010) (table…

Lockhart v. Crews

sion) (petition for review dismissed); Lockhart v. State, 43 So. 3d 690 (Fla. 2010) (table decision)…