From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Harris v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
May 1, 2014
162 So. 3d 1001 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

Opinion

Nos. 2D14–1489 2D14–1071 2D14–1108 2D14–1002.

05-01-2014

Rudolph HARRIS, Jr., Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).


Opinion

BY ORDER OF THE COURT.

The petition for writ of certiorari in 2D14–1489 is denied.

Case number 2D14–1108 is properly proceeding as a civil final appeal. The court's order of March 12, 2014, was vacated on March 20, 2014.

Case 2D14–1002 was properly dismissed because the petition is proceeding as a direct appeal in 2D14–1071. See Chapman v. State, 910 So.2d 940, 941 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005) (“[C]ertiorari review is inappropriate in this case. Direct appeal is the proper vehicle for appellate review of a mandamus petition.”).

VILLANTI, KHOUZAM, and SLEET, JJ., Concur.


Summaries of

Harris v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
May 1, 2014
162 So. 3d 1001 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)
Case details for

Harris v. State

Case Details

Full title:Rudolph HARRIS, Jr., Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Date published: May 1, 2014

Citations

162 So. 3d 1001 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)