From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Harris v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three
Jun 26, 2001
48 S.W.3d 671 (Mo. Ct. App. 2001)

Opinion

No. ED 78844

June 26, 2001

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF ST. CHARLES COUNTY HONORABLE ELLSWORTH CUNDIFF JR.

Nancy Lynne Vincent, Asst. Public Defender, St. Louis, MO, for Appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Andrea Mazza Follett, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.

Before Gary M. Gaertner, Sr., P.J., Lawrence G. Crahan, J., and George W. Draper III, J.



Terry L. Harris (hereinafter, "Movant") appeals from the trial court's judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief for ineffective assistance of counsel. Movant claims counsel was ineffective for failure to: (1) obtain and introduce into evidence National Highway and Transportation Safety Association training manuals for driving while intoxicated detection and field sobriety testing; (2) cross examine the arresting officer concerning his knowledge of, and deviations from, the field sobriety tests performed; and (3) investigate or present evidence of the uneven nature of the lot where the field sobriety tests were conducted.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court's decision is not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value therefore, the judgment of the motion court is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Harris v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three
Jun 26, 2001
48 S.W.3d 671 (Mo. Ct. App. 2001)
Case details for

Harris v. State

Case Details

Full title:TERRY L. HARRIS, Appellant, vs. STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three

Date published: Jun 26, 2001

Citations

48 S.W.3d 671 (Mo. Ct. App. 2001)