From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Harris v. State

Court of Appeals of Alabama
Mar 1, 1932
140 So. 925 (Ala. Crim. App. 1932)

Opinion

6 Div. 129, 130.

January 19, 1932. Rehearing Denied March 1, 1932.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Marion County; Ernest Lacy, Judge.

Certiorari denied by Supreme Court in Harris et al. v. State (6 Div. 133) 224 Ala. 706, 140 So. 922.

Ernest B. Fite, of Hamilton, and H. H. Hamilton, of Russellville, for appellants.

Thos. E. Knight, Jr., Atty. Gen., for the State.


Defendants were convicted of manufacturing whisky. The sole question presented by this record is the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain a conviction. We have read the record and find the evidence sufficient. The affirmative charge was properly refused.

The judgment is affirmed.


Summaries of

Harris v. State

Court of Appeals of Alabama
Mar 1, 1932
140 So. 925 (Ala. Crim. App. 1932)
Case details for

Harris v. State

Case Details

Full title:Benton HARRIS and Reeder Bishop v. STATE

Court:Court of Appeals of Alabama

Date published: Mar 1, 1932

Citations

140 So. 925 (Ala. Crim. App. 1932)
25 Ala. App. 636