Opinion
No. 05-09-00592-CR
Opinion Filed June 3, 2010. DO NOT PUBLISH. Tex. R. App. P. 47.
On Appeal from the 282nd Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas, Trial Court Cause No. F08-54670-S.
Before Justices BRIDGES, FITZGERALD, and FILLMORE.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
A jury convicted Isaac Lemon Harris of murder. See Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 19.02(b)(1) (Vernon 2003). Harris pleaded true to an enhancement paragraph of the indictment, and the jury assessed punishment at ninety-nine years' imprisonment. On appeal, appellant's attorney filed a brief in which he concludes the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). The brief presents a professional evaluation of the record showing why, in effect, there are no arguable grounds to advance. See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 811 (Tex. Crim. App. [Panel Op.] 1978). Counsel delivered a copy of the brief to appellant. We advised appellant he has a right to file a pro se response. Appellant, however, did not file a pro se response. We have reviewed the record and counsel's brief. See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005). We agree the appeal is frivolous and without merit. We find nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeal. We affirm the trial court's judgment.