From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Harris v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Feb 14, 1996
667 So. 2d 1006 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

Summary

concluding the matter in which the items claimed concededly were seized

Summary of this case from Harris v. State

Opinion

No. 95-2879.

February 14, 1996.

An Appeal under Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g) from the Circuit Court for Dade County; Richard V. Margolius, Judge.

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, Marti Rothenberg, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Wanda Raiford, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and COPE and GODERICH, JJ.


Affirmed. § 921.161, Fla.Stat. (1993); Daniels v. State, 491 So.2d 543 (Fla. 1986).


Summaries of

Harris v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Feb 14, 1996
667 So. 2d 1006 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

concluding the matter in which the items claimed concededly were seized

Summary of this case from Harris v. State
Case details for

Harris v. State

Case Details

Full title:Christopher HARRIS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Feb 14, 1996

Citations

667 So. 2d 1006 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

Citing Cases

Harris v. State

While we dismiss the instant appeal as untimely filed, we note that the motion was properly denied on the…