Opinion
485 CA 22-01554
08-11-2023
Emmett HARRIS, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. ROME MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, et al., Defendants, and Emergency Physician Services of New York, P.C., Defendant-Appellant. (Appeal No. 7.)
PHELAN, PHELAN & DANEK, LLP, ALBANY (TIMOTHY S. BRENNAN OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. CHERUNDOLO LAW FIRM, PLLC, SYRACUSE (JOHN C. CHERUNDOLO OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT.
PHELAN, PHELAN & DANEK, LLP, ALBANY (TIMOTHY S. BRENNAN OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
CHERUNDOLO LAW FIRM, PLLC, SYRACUSE (JOHN C. CHERUNDOLO OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT.
PRESENT: PERADOTTO, J.P., BANNISTER, MONTOUR, AND GREENWOOD, JJ.
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal from the order insofar as it denied the cross-motion seeking an order compelling plaintiff to accept the supplemental bill of particulars is unanimously dismissed and the order is affirmed without costs.
Same memorandum as in ( Harris v. Rome Mem. Hosp., [appeal No. 1] 219 A.D.3d 1129, 195 N.Y.S.3d 346 [Aug. 11, 2023] [4th Dept. 2023] ).