From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Harris v. Restivo

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jan 11, 2023
1:20-cv-00797-JLT-EPG (PC) (E.D. Cal. Jan. 11, 2023)

Opinion

1:20-cv-00797-JLT-EPG (PC)

01-11-2023

DEVONTE B. HARRIS, Plaintiff, v. A. RESTIVO, et al., Defendants.


ORDER DIRECTING DEFENSE COUNSEL TO CONTACT ADR COORDINATOR WITHIN FOURTEEN DAYS TO SCHEDULE SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE

On December 19, 2022, the Court granted in part and denied in part Defendants' motion for summary judgment. (ECF No. 56). As Plaintiff's section 1983 malicious prosecution claims against defendants Levan and Restivo survived summary judgment (ECF Nos. 54 & 56), the Court will require the parties to participate in a settlement conference before the case proceeds further. If the case does not settle, the Court will issue an additional scheduling order for the deadlines to proceed to trial.

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that defense counsel has fourteen days from the date of service of this order to contact ADR Coordinator Sujean Park (spark@caed.uscourts.gov) to schedule a settlement conference.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Harris v. Restivo

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jan 11, 2023
1:20-cv-00797-JLT-EPG (PC) (E.D. Cal. Jan. 11, 2023)
Case details for

Harris v. Restivo

Case Details

Full title:DEVONTE B. HARRIS, Plaintiff, v. A. RESTIVO, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Jan 11, 2023

Citations

1:20-cv-00797-JLT-EPG (PC) (E.D. Cal. Jan. 11, 2023)