From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Harris v. Rambosk

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT MYERS DIVISION
Jul 18, 2019
Case No: 2:18-cv-17-FtM-29MRM (M.D. Fla. Jul. 18, 2019)

Opinion

Case No: 2:18-cv-17-FtM-29MRM

07-18-2019

ROBERT DALE HARRIS, Plaintiff, v. KEVIN RAMBOSK, in his official capacity as Sheriff of Collier County, Florida, KASEY P. WINGO, individually, MICHAEL D. CHAPMAN, individually, SCOTT PEPIN, individually, and ROSS ANTHONY, individually, Defendants.


OPINION AND ORDER

This matter is before the Court on consideration of the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (Doc. #134), filed July 1, 2019, recommending that plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File Out of Time Second Amended Complaint to Implead Prior Defendant Ross Anthony Who Was Dismissed From Suit Without Prejudice (Doc. #103) be denied. No objections have been filed and the time to do so has expired.

After conducting a careful and complete review of the findings and recommendations, a district judge may accept, reject or modify the magistrate judge's report and recommendation. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Williams v. Wainwright, 681 F.2d 732 (11th Cir. 1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1112 (1983). In the absence of specific objections, there is no requirement that a district judge review factual findings de novo, Garvey v. Vaughn, 993 F.2d 776, 779 n.9 (11th Cir. 1993), and the court may accept, reject or modify, in whole or in part, the findings and recommendations. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). The district judge reviews legal conclusions de novo, even in the absence of an objection. See Cooper-Houston v. Southern Ry. Co., 37 F.3d 603, 604 (11th Cir. 1994); Castro Bobadilla v. Reno, 826 F. Supp. 1428, 1431-32 (S.D. Fla. 1993), aff'd, 28 F.3d 116 (11th Cir. 1994) (Table).

After conducting an independent examination of the file and upon due consideration of the Report and Recommendation, the Court accepts the Report and Recommendation of the magistrate judge.

Accordingly, it is now

ORDERED:

1. The Report and Recommendation (Doc. #134) is hereby adopted and the findings incorporated herein.

2. Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File Out of Time Second Amended Complaint to Implead Prior Defendant Ross Anthony Who Was Dismissed From Suit Without Prejudice (Doc. #103) is DENIED.

DONE and ORDERED at Fort Myers, Florida, this 18th day of July, 2019.

/s/_________

JOHN E. STEELE

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Copies:
Hon. Mac R. McCoy
United States Magistrate Judge Counsel of Record
Unrepresented parties


Summaries of

Harris v. Rambosk

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT MYERS DIVISION
Jul 18, 2019
Case No: 2:18-cv-17-FtM-29MRM (M.D. Fla. Jul. 18, 2019)
Case details for

Harris v. Rambosk

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT DALE HARRIS, Plaintiff, v. KEVIN RAMBOSK, in his official capacity…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT MYERS DIVISION

Date published: Jul 18, 2019

Citations

Case No: 2:18-cv-17-FtM-29MRM (M.D. Fla. Jul. 18, 2019)