From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Harris v. Pfizer Inc.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Nov 10, 2021
21cv6789 (DLC) (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 10, 2021)

Opinion

21cv6789 (DLC)

11-10-2021

ROSLYN HARRIS and MARY ALLEN, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. PFIZER INC., Defendant.


ORDER

DENISE COTE, District Judge

On October 21, 2021, the defendant filed a motion to dismiss the complaint pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6), Fed.R.Civ.P. On November 10, the plaintiffs filed an amended complaint. Accordingly, it is hereby

ORDERED that the defendant's October 21 motion shall be terminated as moot.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the defendant shall respond to the amended complaint by December 1, 2021. If the defendant renews its motion to dismiss, the plaintiffs shall file any opposition to the renewed motion by December 22. Defendant shall file any reply by January 5, 2022. At the time any reply is served, the moving party shall supply Chambers with two (2) courtesy copies of all motion papers by mailing or delivering them to the United States Courthouse, 500 Pearl Street, New York, New York.


Summaries of

Harris v. Pfizer Inc.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Nov 10, 2021
21cv6789 (DLC) (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 10, 2021)
Case details for

Harris v. Pfizer Inc.

Case Details

Full title:ROSLYN HARRIS and MARY ALLEN, on behalf of themselves and all others…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Nov 10, 2021

Citations

21cv6789 (DLC) (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 10, 2021)