In Harris v. Panama R.R. Co. (58 N.Y. 660) (as stated in Sedgwick on the Measure of Damages, vol. 1 [8th ed.], p. 369), "The plaintiff's race horse was injured while being transported across the Isthmus of Panama.
Summary of this case from Wildes v. RobinsonArgued June 10, 1874
Decided September 22, 1874
D.B. Eaton for the appellant.
Benj. M. Stilwell for the respondent.
JOHNSON, J., reads for affirmance.
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.
In Harris v. Panama R.R. Co. (58 N.Y. 660) (as stated in Sedgwick on the Measure of Damages, vol. 1 [8th ed.], p. 369), "The plaintiff's race horse was injured while being transported across the Isthmus of Panama.
Summary of this case from Wildes v. RobinsonIn Harris v. Panama Railroad Company (58 N.Y. 660) the court, in admitting evidence of market value at San Francisco, stated: "This species of evidence could only be completely reliable where it appears that similar articles have been bought and sold, in the way of trade, in sufficient quantity or often enough to show a market value, and in the absence of such proof, proof of such value at some other place was admissible."
Summary of this case from Stuart v. SpitzerFull title:JOHN H. HARRIS, Respondent, v . THE PANAMA RAILROAD COMPANY, Appellant
Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Date published: Sep 22, 1874
We can take judicial notice that the Philadelphia market is one in constant communication with that of New…
Wallingford v. Kaiser( Keller v. Paine, 34 Hun, 167, 176.) This may be as far removed as San Francisco is from the Isthmus of…