From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Harris v. Paige

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Apr 4, 2011
CIVIL ACTION NO. 08-2126 (E.D. Pa. Apr. 4, 2011)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 08-2126.

April 4, 2011


ORDER


AND NOW this 4th day of April, 2011, upon consideration of the Motion to Amend Answer ("Motion to Amend") (Doc. No. 70) filed by Defendant Michael Paige ("Defendant"), the Motion to Strike Defendant's Amended Complaint ("Plaintiff's Motion to Strike") (Doc. No. 73) filed by Plaintiff, James Harris ("Plaintiff"), the Opposition thereto filed by Defendant (Doc. No. 74), and the Motion in Opposition (Doc. No. 76) filed by Plaintiff, it is hereby ORDERED that:

(1) Defendant's Motion to Amend is DENIED;
(2) Plaintiff's Motion to Strike is GRANTED; and
(3) Plaintiff's Motion in Opposition is DENIED as moot.


Summaries of

Harris v. Paige

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Apr 4, 2011
CIVIL ACTION NO. 08-2126 (E.D. Pa. Apr. 4, 2011)
Case details for

Harris v. Paige

Case Details

Full title:JAMES HARRIS, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL PAIGE, and CITY OF PHILADELPHIA…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Apr 4, 2011

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 08-2126 (E.D. Pa. Apr. 4, 2011)