From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Harris v. O'Keefe

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 20, 2011
1:11cv01553 DLB (E.D. Cal. Sep. 20, 2011)

Opinion

1:11cv01553 DLB

09-20-2011

CHRISTOPHER L. HARRIS Plaintiff, v. DONALD O'KEEFE; and U.S. MARSHAL, Defendants.


ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT

TO REDESIGNATE ACTION AS A

REGULAR CIVIL CASE

Plaintiff Christopher L. Harris ("Plaintiff"), a prisoner proceeding pro se, filed his civil rights complaint on September 14, 2011. Review of the complaint reveals that Plaintiff's civil rights case does not involve the conditions of his confinement.

On September 16, 2011, the Court directed Plaintiff to submit an application to proceed in forma pauperis or pay the $350.00 filing fee for this action within 45 days.

Therefore, the Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to redesignate this action to reflect that it is a regular civil case and assign a district court judge.

No scheduling conference should be set at this time.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dennis L. Beck

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Harris v. O'Keefe

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 20, 2011
1:11cv01553 DLB (E.D. Cal. Sep. 20, 2011)
Case details for

Harris v. O'Keefe

Case Details

Full title:CHRISTOPHER L. HARRIS Plaintiff, v. DONALD O'KEEFE; and U.S. MARSHAL…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Sep 20, 2011

Citations

1:11cv01553 DLB (E.D. Cal. Sep. 20, 2011)