From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Harris v. Newsom

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Dec 1, 2021
2:21-CV-2124-DMC-P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 1, 2021)

Opinion

2:21-CV-2124-DMC-P

12-01-2021

DARREN HARRIS, Petitioner, v. GAVIN NEWSOM, Respondent.


ORDER

DENNIS M. COTA UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Pending before the Court is Petitioner's petition, ECF No. 1. “A petitioner for habeas corpus relief must name the state officer having custody of him or her as the respondent to the petition.” Stanley v. California Supreme Court, 21 F.3d 359, 360 (9th Cir. 1994); see also Rule 2(a), Federal Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases. Because Petitioner has not named the appropriate state officer, Petitioner will be provided leave to amend to correct this technical defect by naming the correct respondent. See Stanley, 21 F.3d at 360. Petitioner is warned that failure to comply with this order may result in the dismissal of this action. See Local Rule 110.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Petitioner's petition for writ of habeas corpus, ECF No. 1, is dismissed with leave to amend;
2. Petitioner shall file an amended petition on the form employed by this court, and which names the proper respondent and states all claims and requests for relief, within 30 days of the date of this order; and
3. The Clerk of the Court is directed to send Petitioner the Court's form habeas corpus application.


Summaries of

Harris v. Newsom

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Dec 1, 2021
2:21-CV-2124-DMC-P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 1, 2021)
Case details for

Harris v. Newsom

Case Details

Full title:DARREN HARRIS, Petitioner, v. GAVIN NEWSOM, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Dec 1, 2021

Citations

2:21-CV-2124-DMC-P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 1, 2021)