From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Harris v. New York Athletic Club

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Dec 6, 1934
153 Misc. 840 (N.Y. App. Term 1934)

Opinion

December 6, 1934.

Appeal from the Municipal Court, Borough of Manhattan, Third District.

Albert Harris, for the appellant.

William A. Earl, for the respondent.


Section 1078 of the Civil Practice Act does not prohibit the plaintiff from pursuing her cause of action on a coupon attached to a bond securing a second mortgage while the action is pending to foreclose a first mortgage. (See Reichert v. Stilwell, 172 N.Y. 83.) It was, therefore, error to deny summary judgment.

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs, and motion granted.

All concur; present, LYDON, HAMMER and SHIENTAG, JJ.


Summaries of

Harris v. New York Athletic Club

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Dec 6, 1934
153 Misc. 840 (N.Y. App. Term 1934)
Case details for

Harris v. New York Athletic Club

Case Details

Full title:FANNIE D. HARRIS, Appellant, v. NEW YORK ATHLETIC CLUB, Respondent

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department

Date published: Dec 6, 1934

Citations

153 Misc. 840 (N.Y. App. Term 1934)
276 N.Y.S. 211