From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Harris v. Muhammad

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Jun 15, 2022
21-cv-00283-HSG (N.D. Cal. Jun. 15, 2022)

Opinion

21-cv-00283-HSG

06-15-2022

MAURICE LYDELL HARRIS, Plaintiff, v. CLERIC MUHAMMAD, et al., Defendants.


ORDER REQUIRING RESPONSE FROM DEFENDANTS

Re: Dkt. No. 17

HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR.UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Plaintiff has filed a motion for a temporary restraining order. Dkt. No. 17. Defendants are ordered to respond to this motion by June 29, 2022. The motion shall be deemed submitted as of this date. No hearing will be held on the motion unless otherwise ordered.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Harris v. Muhammad

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Jun 15, 2022
21-cv-00283-HSG (N.D. Cal. Jun. 15, 2022)
Case details for

Harris v. Muhammad

Case Details

Full title:MAURICE LYDELL HARRIS, Plaintiff, v. CLERIC MUHAMMAD, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Jun 15, 2022

Citations

21-cv-00283-HSG (N.D. Cal. Jun. 15, 2022)