From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Harris v. Mkitchyan

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Dec 22, 2021
2:19-cv-01040-JAM-JDP (PC) (E.D. Cal. Dec. 22, 2021)

Opinion

2:19-cv-01040-JAM-JDP (PC)

12-22-2021

EMMETT HARRIS, Plaintiff, v. MKITCHYAN, Defendant.


ORDER

THE HONORABLE JOHN A. MENDEZ, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE.

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On November 5, 2021, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Neither party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed November 5, 2021, are adopted in full;

2. This action is dismissed for failure to prosecute, failure to comply with court orders, and failure to state a claim for the reasons set forth in the June 28, 2021 order; and

3. The Clerk of Court is directed to close the case.


Summaries of

Harris v. Mkitchyan

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Dec 22, 2021
2:19-cv-01040-JAM-JDP (PC) (E.D. Cal. Dec. 22, 2021)
Case details for

Harris v. Mkitchyan

Case Details

Full title:EMMETT HARRIS, Plaintiff, v. MKITCHYAN, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Dec 22, 2021

Citations

2:19-cv-01040-JAM-JDP (PC) (E.D. Cal. Dec. 22, 2021)