From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Harris v. Maplewood Police Dep't

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Jul 27, 2018
Civil No. 17-CV-392 (MJD/SER) (D. Minn. Jul. 27, 2018)

Opinion

Civil No. 17-CV-392 (MJD/SER)

07-27-2018

Anthony Harris, Plaintiff, v. Maplewood Police Department, Menard Inc., John Doe, Jane Doe, and Jim Doe, Defendants.


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

The above-entitled matter comes before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Steven E. Rau, dated June 18, 2018 [Docket No. 81]. No objections have been filed to that Report and Recommendation in the time period permitted.

Based on the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, and all of the files, records and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Defendant Menard, Inc.'s ("Menards") Motion to Dismiss [Doc. No. 30] is GRANTED; and

2. Plaintiff Anthony Harris's claims against Mendard Inc. ("Menards") are DISMISSED without prejudice.
Dated: July 27, 2018

s/Michael J . Davis

Michael J. Davis

United States District Court Judge


Summaries of

Harris v. Maplewood Police Dep't

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Jul 27, 2018
Civil No. 17-CV-392 (MJD/SER) (D. Minn. Jul. 27, 2018)
Case details for

Harris v. Maplewood Police Dep't

Case Details

Full title:Anthony Harris, Plaintiff, v. Maplewood Police Department, Menard Inc.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

Date published: Jul 27, 2018

Citations

Civil No. 17-CV-392 (MJD/SER) (D. Minn. Jul. 27, 2018)

Citing Cases

Leekley-Winslow v. Medlicott

"'The traditional definition of acting under color of state law requires that the defendant in a § 1983…