From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Harris v. Macomber

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Dec 6, 2021
2:16-cv-0830 TLN DB P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 6, 2021)

Opinion

2:16-cv-0830 TLN DB P

12-06-2021

GRADY HARRIS, Plaintiff, v. JEFF MACOMBER, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

DEBORAH BARNES UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with a civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff alleges defendants violated his First and Eighth Amendment rights. Presently before the court is counsel for defendants Calderon, Cervantes, Fong, Fuller, Munoz, Rose, Thompson, and Williamson request to modify the August 5, 2021 Amended Discovery and Scheduling Order. (ECF No. 115.)

In support of the motion counsel states that additional time is required to secure declarations to support defendants' renewed motion for summary judgment. Good cause appearing the court will grant the motion.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Defendants' motion to modify the Amended Discovery and Scheduling Order (ECF No. 115) is granted;
2. Pretrial motions shall be filed on or before February 8, 2022; and
3. In all other respects the August 5, 2021 Amended Discovery and Scheduling Order remains the same.


Summaries of

Harris v. Macomber

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Dec 6, 2021
2:16-cv-0830 TLN DB P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 6, 2021)
Case details for

Harris v. Macomber

Case Details

Full title:GRADY HARRIS, Plaintiff, v. JEFF MACOMBER, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Dec 6, 2021

Citations

2:16-cv-0830 TLN DB P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 6, 2021)