From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Harris v. Lewis

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Dec 13, 2012
No. 2:12-cv-2978 EFB P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 13, 2012)

Opinion

No. 2:12-cv-2978 EFB P

12-13-2012

EARNEST S. HARRIS, Petitioner, v. R. LEWIS, Respondent.


ORDER

Petitioner is a state prisoner without counsel seeking a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. He seeks leave to proceed in forma pauperis. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915. However, petitioner has commenced this action in the wrong district.

In a habeas action, venue is proper in either the district of confinement or the district of conviction. 28 U.S.C. 2241(d). Petitioner was convicted in the Del Norte County Superior Court and is currently confined at Pelican Bay Prison, which is located in Del Norte County. Thus, the Eastern District is not a proper venue for this action. See 28 U.S.C. 84(b).

The court will transfer this action to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. See Rule 12, Rules Governing § 2254 Cases; 28 U.S.C. §§ 84(a), 1404(a). The court declines to take action on petitioner's application to proceed in forma pauperis.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that this action is transferred to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California.

______________

EDMUND F. BRENNAN

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Harris v. Lewis

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Dec 13, 2012
No. 2:12-cv-2978 EFB P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 13, 2012)
Case details for

Harris v. Lewis

Case Details

Full title:EARNEST S. HARRIS, Petitioner, v. R. LEWIS, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Dec 13, 2012

Citations

No. 2:12-cv-2978 EFB P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 13, 2012)