From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Harris v. Kijakazi

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 27, 2022
1:21-cv-1299-GSA (E.D. Cal. Jun. 27, 2022)

Opinion

1:21-cv-1299-GSA

06-27-2022

DIANA HARRIS, o/b/o ESTATE OF KENNTH KRUPP Plaintiff, v. KILOLO KIJAKAZI, acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.


ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF EXTENSION TO FILE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

GARY S. AUSTIN, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The parties stipulate to an extension of time from June 20, 2022 to July 11, 2022 for Plaintiff to file a motion for summary judgment due to counsel's illness. This is Plaintiff's third extension.

When considering whether good cause exists to modify a scheduling order, courts consider the foreseeability of the impediment to meeting the deadline and the party's diligence in seeking the extension once it became apparent they could not meet the deadline. See Sharp v. Covenant Care LLC, 288 F.R.D. 465, 467 (S.D. Cal. 2012); Ordaz Gonzalez v. Cty. of Fresno, No. 1:18-CV-01558-BAM, 2020 WL 2539287, at *2 (E.D. Cal. May 19, 2020). The Court has the inherent power to manage its own docket to achieve an orderly and expeditious resolution of cases. Southern California Edison Co. v. Lynch, 307 F.3d 794 (9th Cir. 2002).

Counsel identified good cause for the extension. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that Plaintiff's deadline to file a motion for summary judgment is extended to and including July 11, 2022. All other deadlines are adjusted accordingly.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Harris v. Kijakazi

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 27, 2022
1:21-cv-1299-GSA (E.D. Cal. Jun. 27, 2022)
Case details for

Harris v. Kijakazi

Case Details

Full title:DIANA HARRIS, o/b/o ESTATE OF KENNTH KRUPP Plaintiff, v. KILOLO KIJAKAZI…

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Jun 27, 2022

Citations

1:21-cv-1299-GSA (E.D. Cal. Jun. 27, 2022)