From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Harris v. Jones

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
May 16, 2023
2:23-cv-0828 KJN P (E.D. Cal. May. 16, 2023)

Opinion

2:23-cv-0828 KJN P

05-16-2023

DAVID DEMOND HARRIS, Petitioner, v. GENA JONES, WARDEN, Respondent.


ORDER

KENDALL J. NEWMAN UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Petitioner has not filed a request to proceed in forma pauperis or paid the court's filing fee.

The application attacks a conviction issued by the Alameda County Superior Court. (ECF No. 1 at 3, 8-11.) While both this court and the United States District Court in the district where petitioner was convicted have jurisdiction, see Braden v. 30th Judicial Circuit Court, 410 U.S. 484 (1973), any and all witnesses and evidence necessary for the resolution of petitioner's application are more readily available in Alameda County. Id. at 499 n.15; 28 U.S.C. § 2241(d).

Accordingly, in the furtherance of justice, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this matter is transferred to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California.


Summaries of

Harris v. Jones

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
May 16, 2023
2:23-cv-0828 KJN P (E.D. Cal. May. 16, 2023)
Case details for

Harris v. Jones

Case Details

Full title:DAVID DEMOND HARRIS, Petitioner, v. GENA JONES, WARDEN, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: May 16, 2023

Citations

2:23-cv-0828 KJN P (E.D. Cal. May. 16, 2023)