From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Harris v. Home Depot

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Oct 15, 2012
Case No: 11-13661 (E.D. Mich. Oct. 15, 2012)

Opinion

Case No: 11-13661

10-15-2012

VERA HARRIS, Plaintiff, v. THE HOME DEPOT, Defendant.


Honorable Victoria A. Roberts


ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION

Plaintiff filed the above entitled motion following the entry of this Court's Order dismissing her case with prejudice. The Court requested that Home Depot respond to the motion. Home Depot did that on October 9, 2012.

Eastern District of Michigan Local Rule 7.1 provides that a motion for reconsideration will be granted only if the moving party demonstrates a palpable defect by which the Court, the parties and other persons entitled to be heard on the motion have been misled. The moving party must also show that correcting the defect will result in a different disposition of the case.

There was no palpable defect by which the Court was misled in dismissing Plaintiff's Complaint. Plaintiff was on notice that she had certain obligations to fulfill to avoid dismissal; she failed to meet those obligations.

The Motion for Reconsideration is DENIED. Defendant's request for costs, attorney fees and/or other sanctions is DENIED.

IT IS ORDERED.

______________

Victoria A. Roberts

United States District Judge

The undersigned certifies that a copy of this document was served on the attorneys of record by electronic means or U.S. Mail on October 15, 2012.

Linda Vertriest

Deputy Clerk


Summaries of

Harris v. Home Depot

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Oct 15, 2012
Case No: 11-13661 (E.D. Mich. Oct. 15, 2012)
Case details for

Harris v. Home Depot

Case Details

Full title:VERA HARRIS, Plaintiff, v. THE HOME DEPOT, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Oct 15, 2012

Citations

Case No: 11-13661 (E.D. Mich. Oct. 15, 2012)