From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Harris v. Hill

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Aug 11, 2021
2:19-cv-1037 KJM AC P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 11, 2021)

Opinion

2:19-cv-1037 KJM AC P

08-11-2021

EMMETT HARRIS, Plaintiff, v. RICK M. HILL, et al., Defendant.


ORDER

ALLISON CLAIRE, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Plaintiff is a former state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. By order filed June 21, 2021, this case was referred to the court's Post-Screening ADR (Alternative Dispute Resolution) Project and stayed for a period of 120 days. ECF No. 23. That order provided defendants the opportunity to request opting out of the ADR Project based on a good faith belief that a settlement conference would be a waste of resources. Id. at 2. Defendants now request to opt out of the Post-Screening ADR Project and that the stay be lifted. ECF No. 29. Having reviewed the request, the court finds good cause to grant it.

Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Defendants' request to opt out of the Post-Screening ADR Project, ECF No. 29, is GRANTED.

2. The stay of this action, commencing June 21, 2021, ECF No. 23, is LIFTED.

3. Within thirty days of the filing of this order, defendants shall file a response to the complaint.


Summaries of

Harris v. Hill

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Aug 11, 2021
2:19-cv-1037 KJM AC P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 11, 2021)
Case details for

Harris v. Hill

Case Details

Full title:EMMETT HARRIS, Plaintiff, v. RICK M. HILL, et al., Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Aug 11, 2021

Citations

2:19-cv-1037 KJM AC P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 11, 2021)