From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Harris v. Hill

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jul 22, 2021
2:19-cv-1037 KJM AC P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 22, 2021)

Opinion

2:19-cv-1037 KJM AC P

07-22-2021

EMMETT HARRIS, Plaintiff, v. R. HILL, et al., Defendant.

Rob Bonta, State Attorney General of California Tyler V. Heath, Supervising Deputy Attorney General Garrett L. Seuell, Deputy Attorney General Attorneys for Defendants R. Hill and D. Nagtaion


Rob Bonta, State Attorney General of California Tyler V. Heath, Supervising Deputy Attorney General Garrett L. Seuell, Deputy Attorney General Attorneys for Defendants R. Hill and D. Nagtaion

[PROPOSED] ORDER

ALLISON CLAIRE, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Defendants request a twenty-one (21) day extension of the deadline to file a motion to opt out of the Post-Screening Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) Project. After reviewing Defendants' request, and good cause appearing, Defendants' request is GRANTED. Defendants shall have an additional twenty-one (21) days, or until August 11, 2021, to file their motion to opt out of the Post-Screening ADR Project.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Harris v. Hill

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jul 22, 2021
2:19-cv-1037 KJM AC P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 22, 2021)
Case details for

Harris v. Hill

Case Details

Full title:EMMETT HARRIS, Plaintiff, v. R. HILL, et al., Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Jul 22, 2021

Citations

2:19-cv-1037 KJM AC P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 22, 2021)