From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Harris v. Gilmore

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Jun 22, 2018
Civil Action No. 17 - 610 (W.D. Pa. Jun. 22, 2018)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 17 - 610

06-22-2018

CHRISTOPHER LEE HARRIS, Petitioner, v. ROBERT GILMORE, Superintendent, SCI-Greene, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF ALLEGHENY and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, Respondents.



Magistrate Judge Lisa Pupo Lenihan MEMORANDUM ORDER

Pending before the Court is a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Petitioner Christopher Lee Harris ("Petitioner") on June 27, 2017, wherein he challenges his judgment of sentence out of Allegheny County after a jury convicted him of third degree murder on February 1, 2012. (ECF No. 5.) In accordance with the Magistrate Judge's Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and Rules 72.C and 72.D of the Local Rules of Court, all pretrial matters were referred to United States Magistrate Judge Lisa Pupo Lenihan.

On June 5, 2018, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation ("R&R") recommending that the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus be denied and that a Certificate of Appealability also be denied. (ECF No. 40.) The R&R was served on the parties and Petitioner filed timely written objections on June 21, 2018. (ECF No. 41.) In resolving a party's objections, the Court conducts a de novo review of any part of the R&R that has been properly objected to. Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3); 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). The Court may accept, reject, or modify the recommended disposition, as well as receive further evidence or return the matter to the magistrate judge with instructions. Id.

After careful de novo review, the following Order is now entered.

AND NOW, this 22nd day of June, 2018;

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the R&R of the Magistrate Judge (ECF No. 40) is adopted as the opinion of the Court.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (ECF No. 5) is denied.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED a Certificate of Appealability is denied.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court mark this case CLOSED.

AND IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that pursuant to Rule 4(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, Petitioner has thirty (30) days to file a notice of appeal as provided by Rule 3 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure.

By the Court:

/s/_________

Arthur J. Schwab

United States District Judge cc: Christopher Lee Harris

KM-9238

SCI Greene

175 Progress Drive

Waynesburg, PA 15370

Counsel for Respondent

(Via CM/ECF electronic mail)


Summaries of

Harris v. Gilmore

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Jun 22, 2018
Civil Action No. 17 - 610 (W.D. Pa. Jun. 22, 2018)
Case details for

Harris v. Gilmore

Case Details

Full title:CHRISTOPHER LEE HARRIS, Petitioner, v. ROBERT GILMORE, Superintendent…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Jun 22, 2018

Citations

Civil Action No. 17 - 610 (W.D. Pa. Jun. 22, 2018)