From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Harris v. Gee

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Apr 1, 2014
150 So. 3d 1144 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

Opinion

Nos. 2D14–1002 2D14–1071.

2014-04-1

Rudolph HARRIS, Jr., Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. David GEE, Sheriff of Hillsborough County, Appellee/Respondent(s).


BY ORDER OF THE COURT.

Because the petition is properly proceeding as a direct appeal in 2D14–1071, petitioner's petition for writ of certiorari in case 2D14–1002 is dismissed. See Chapman v. State, 910 So.2d 940, 941 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005) (“[C]ertiorari review is inappropriate in this case. Direct appeal is the proper vehicle for appellate review of a mandamus petition.”).

Petitioner's motion to correct the record is denied.

VILLANTI, WALLACE, and MORRIS, JJ., Concur.


Summaries of

Harris v. Gee

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Apr 1, 2014
150 So. 3d 1144 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)
Case details for

Harris v. Gee

Case Details

Full title:Rudolph HARRIS, Jr., Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. David GEE, Sheriff of…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Date published: Apr 1, 2014

Citations

150 So. 3d 1144 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)