From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Harris v. Fine

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 9, 1966
26 A.D.2d 522 (N.Y. App. Div. 1966)

Opinion

June 9, 1966


Order entered April 8, 1965, vacating defendant's default in pleading and granting defendant leave to serve an answer, unanimously modified, on the law and on the facts, to the extent of providing as a further condition for the vacatur the posting of a surety company bond by defendant in the sum of $25,000, within 30 days from the entry of the order hereon, to secure the ultimate payment of $23,000, the amount conceded to be due her, together with costs and disbursements, and, as so modified, affirmed, with $30 costs and disbursements to plaintiff-appellant. CPLR 5015 (subd. [a]) permits the court to relieve a party from a judgment "upon such terms as may be just". In the instant case, the court granted the motion "upon condition that defendant pay plaintiff's attorneys a full bill of costs herein within ten days after service of a copy of the order to be settled hereon, with notice of entry, and that the judgment stand as security". We feel that the further condition is required in the interests of justice.

Concur — Botein, P.J., McNally, Eager, Steuer and Capozzoli, JJ.


Summaries of

Harris v. Fine

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 9, 1966
26 A.D.2d 522 (N.Y. App. Div. 1966)
Case details for

Harris v. Fine

Case Details

Full title:LAIDILY S. HARRIS, Appellant, v. HERMAN FINE, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jun 9, 1966

Citations

26 A.D.2d 522 (N.Y. App. Div. 1966)