From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Harris v. Filmon

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
May 19, 1978
358 So. 2d 905 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1978)

Opinion

No. 77-1947.

May 19, 1978.

Appeal from the Pinellas County Circuit Court, Clyde M. Kissinger, J.

Charles S. Carrere of Harrison, Greene, Mann, Rowe, Stanton Mastry, St. Petersburg, for appellant.

No appearance for appellee.


This is an appeal from a dismissal of an action for failure to prosecute. Appellant contends the dismissal was improper because she was not afforded prior notice or hearing. We agree and reverse.

On January 10, 1973 appellant and her husband filed a complaint against appellee for damages arising out of an automobile accident. The case eventually went to trial and the jury returned a verdict in favor of appellant on May 3, 1976. The appellant, on May 7, 1976, filed a motion for new trial alleging the damages awarded were grossly inadequate. This motion was denied on June 30, 1976. Months later, on November 2, 1977, without prior notice or hearing thereon, the trial court dismissed the case with prejudice.

Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.420(e) requires notice and a hearing before a case can be dismissed for failure to prosecute. Since the trial court afforded appellant neither notice nor hearing, its order dismissing the case was improper and must be reversed. See Franklin Acceptance Corp. v. Superior Electrical Industries, Inc., 167 So.2d 116 (Fla. 3d DCA 1964).

REVERSED and REMANDED for further proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion.

BOARDMAN, C.J., and DANAHY, J., concur.


Summaries of

Harris v. Filmon

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
May 19, 1978
358 So. 2d 905 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1978)
Case details for

Harris v. Filmon

Case Details

Full title:RUTH HARRIS, APPELLANT, v. RAYMOND WILLIAM FILMON, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: May 19, 1978

Citations

358 So. 2d 905 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1978)

Citing Cases

Metro Obras v. Federal Deposit Ins. Co.

In the order now under review, the trial court set aside a dismissal for lack of prosecution on the ground…

Florida East Coast Ry. Co. v. Russell

Although it is true that either an interested party, or the trial court on its own motion, may move to…