From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

HARRIS v. DUC

United States District Court, E.D. California
May 19, 2008
No. CIV S-06-2138 JAM DAD P (E.D. Cal. May. 19, 2008)

Opinion

No. CIV S-06-2138 JAM DAD P.

May 19, 2008


ORDER


Plaintiff has filed a document entitled "initial request for discovery." Plaintiff is informed that court permission is not necessary for discovery requests and that neither discovery requests served on an opposing party nor that party's responses should be filed until such time as a party becomes dissatisfied with a response and seeks relief from the court pursuant to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Discovery requests between the parties shall not be filed with the court unless, and until, they are at issue.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's May 12, 2008 initial request for discovery will be placed in the court file and disregarded. Plaintiff is cautioned that further filing of discovery requests or responses, except as required by rule of court, may result in an order of sanctions, including, but not limited to, a recommendation that this action be dismissed.


Summaries of

HARRIS v. DUC

United States District Court, E.D. California
May 19, 2008
No. CIV S-06-2138 JAM DAD P (E.D. Cal. May. 19, 2008)
Case details for

HARRIS v. DUC

Case Details

Full title:ANDANTE A. HARRIS, Plaintiff, v. V. DUC, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: May 19, 2008

Citations

No. CIV S-06-2138 JAM DAD P (E.D. Cal. May. 19, 2008)