From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Harris v. Dreesen

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Jul 26, 2023
2:22-cv-01231-JAD-EJY (D. Nev. Jul. 26, 2023)

Opinion

2:22-cv-01231-JAD-EJY

07-26-2023

AMMAR HARRIS, Plaintiffs, v. F. DREESEN, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

ELAYNA J. YOUCHAH UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pending before the Court is Plaintiff's Motion for Settlement Conference. ECF No. 42.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion for Settlement Conference (ECF No. 42) is DENIED without prejudice.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that counsel for Defendants must arrange a date and time to speak with Plaintiff by telephone for purposes of considering whether a settlement conference is an appropriate use of judicial resources. The telephone conference must occur no later than August 19, 2023.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that after the parties meet and confer for purposes of discussing whether a settlement conference will be fruitful, the parties are to file either a stipulation representing their agreement to proceed with a settlement conference or individual status reports in which each party provides the Court with his/their position regarding the potential for resolution through a court sponsored conference. The stipulation or individual status reports are due no later than August 31, 2023.


Summaries of

Harris v. Dreesen

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Jul 26, 2023
2:22-cv-01231-JAD-EJY (D. Nev. Jul. 26, 2023)
Case details for

Harris v. Dreesen

Case Details

Full title:AMMAR HARRIS, Plaintiffs, v. F. DREESEN, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, District of Nevada

Date published: Jul 26, 2023

Citations

2:22-cv-01231-JAD-EJY (D. Nev. Jul. 26, 2023)