From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Harris v. Dreesen

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Nov 29, 2022
2:22-cv-01231-JAD-EJY (D. Nev. Nov. 29, 2022)

Opinion

2:22-cv-01231-JAD-EJY

11-29-2022

Ammar Harris, Plaintiff, v. F. Dreesen, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

ELAYNA J. YOUCHAH UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

This action commenced on August 1, 2022, when Plaintiff filed his application to proceed in forma pauperis together with a Civil Rights Complaint. ECF Nos. 1, 1-1. The financial information provided by Plaintiff demonstrates he is unable to prepay the filing fee in this matter.

On September 26, 2022, the Court imposed a stay of the case and ordered the parties to settle their disputes under the Court's Inmate Early Mediation Program. ECF No. 8. On November 15, 2022, the Court granted Plaintiff's Motion to Exclude Case From Mediation and ordered that this action proceed on the litigation track. ECF No. 14.

For the foregoing reasons, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. This case is no longer stayed.

2. Plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 1) is GRANTED. Plaintiff is permitted to maintain this action to conclusion without the necessity of prepayment of any additional fees or costs or the giving of security therefor.

3. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915, as amended by the Prison Litigation Reform Act, the Nevada Department of Corrections will forward payments from the account of Ammar Harris, #1116547, to the Clerk of the United States District Court, District of Nevada, at a rate of 20% of the preceding month's deposits (in months that the account exceeds $10) until the full $350 filing fee has been paid for this action. The Clerk of the Court must SEND a copy of this Order to (1) the Finance Division of the Clerk's Office and (2) the attention of the Chief of Inmate Services for the Nevada Department of Corrections, P.O. Box 7011, Carson City, NV 89702.

4. The Clerk of the Court will electronically SERVE a copy of this Order, the Screening Order (ECF No. 8), the Court's November 15, 2022 Order (ECF No. 14), and Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint (ECF No. 7) on the Office of the Attorney General of the State of Nevada. This does not indicate acceptance of service.

5. Subject to the findings of the Screening Order (ECF No. 8), within 21 days of the date of entry of this Order, the Attorney General's Office must file a notice advising the Court and Plaintiff of: (a) the names of the defendants for whom it accepts service; (b) the names of the defendants for whom it does not accept service, and (c) the names of the defendants for whom it is filing the last-known-address information under seal. As to any of the named defendants for whom the Attorney General's Office cannot accept service, the Attorney General's Office must file, under seal, but shall not serve the inmate Plaintiff the last known address(es) of those defendant(s) for whom it has such information. If the last known address of the defendant(s) is a post office box, the Attorney General's Office must attempt to obtain and provide the last known physical address(es).

6. If service cannot be accepted for any of the named defendant(s), Plaintiff must file a motion identifying the unserved defendant(s), requesting issuance of a summons, and specifying a full name and address for the defendant(s). For the defendant(s) the Attorney General's Office cannot provide last-known-address information, Plaintiff must provide the full name and address, if known, for the defendant(s).

7. If the Attorney General's Office accepts service of process for any named defendant(s), such defendant(s) must file and serve an answer or other response to the First Amended Complaint (ECF No. 7) no later than 60 days from the date of this Order.

8. Service of the operative complaint must be accomplished within 90 days of the date of this Order.

9. Plaintiff must serve upon defendant(s) or, if an appearance has been entered by counsel, upon their attorney(s), a copy of every pleading, motion or other document submitted for consideration by the Court. Plaintiff shall include with the original document submitted for filing a certificate stating the date that a true and correct copy of the document was mailed or electronically filed to the defendants or counsel for the defendants. If counsel has entered a notice of appearance, Plaintiff shall direct service to the individual attorney named in the notice of appearance, at the physical or electronic address stated therein. The Court may disregard any document received by a district judge or magistrate judge that has not been filed with the Clerk, and any document received by a district judge, magistrate judge, or the Clerk that fails to include a certificate showing proper service.


Summaries of

Harris v. Dreesen

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Nov 29, 2022
2:22-cv-01231-JAD-EJY (D. Nev. Nov. 29, 2022)
Case details for

Harris v. Dreesen

Case Details

Full title:Ammar Harris, Plaintiff, v. F. Dreesen, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, District of Nevada

Date published: Nov 29, 2022

Citations

2:22-cv-01231-JAD-EJY (D. Nev. Nov. 29, 2022)