From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Harris v. Donahoe

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Jan 30, 2012
Civil Action No. 12 0145 (D.D.C. Jan. 30, 2012)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 12 0145

01-30-2012

Aretha Harris, Plaintiff, v. Patrick R. Donahoe, Postmaster General et al., Defendants.


MEMORANDUM OPINION

This matter is before the Court on its initial review of plaintiff's pro se complaint, which is accompanied by an application to proceed in forma pauperis. The Court will grant the application and will dismiss the case for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(h)(3) (requiring dismissal of an action "at any time" the Court determines that it lacks subject matter jurisdiction).

Plaintiff sues the Postmaster General and the Postmaster in Waycross, Georgia, for the alleged mishandling of a certified letter she allegedly sent to Fingerhut Corporation pertaining to a bill. See Compl. at 1 & Attachments. The Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction over "[a]ny claim arising out of the loss, miscarriage, or negligent transmission of letters or postal matter." 28 U.S.C. § 2680(b). A separate Order of dismissal accompanies this Memorandum Opinion.

_______________

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Harris v. Donahoe

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Jan 30, 2012
Civil Action No. 12 0145 (D.D.C. Jan. 30, 2012)
Case details for

Harris v. Donahoe

Case Details

Full title:Aretha Harris, Plaintiff, v. Patrick R. Donahoe, Postmaster General et…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Date published: Jan 30, 2012

Citations

Civil Action No. 12 0145 (D.D.C. Jan. 30, 2012)