From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Harris v. Department of Veterans Affairs

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Mar 29, 2006
Civil Action No. 05-492 (W.D. Pa. Mar. 29, 2006)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 05-492.

March 29, 2006


MEMORANDUM ORDER


Plaintiff's Complaint was received by the Clerk of Court of April 14, 2005 and was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Lisa Pupo Lenihan for pretrial proceedings in accordance with the Magistrate's Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and Rules 72.1.3 and 72.1.4 of the Local Rules for Magistrates.

The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 13) filed on March 2, 2006, recommended that the Motion to Dismiss or in the alternative, Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Defendant be granted. Service was made on all counsel of record and on Lester Harris, pro se. The parties were informed that in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and (C), and Rule 72.1.4(B) of the Local Rules for Magistrates, that they had ten (10) days to file any objections. No objections have been filed. After review of the pleadings and the documents in the case, together with the Report and Recommendation, the following Order is entered: AND NOW, this 29th day of March, 2006;

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant's Motion to Dismiss or in the alternative, Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 4) is granted.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 13) of Magistrate Judge Lenihan, dated March 2, 2006, is adopted as the Opinion of the Court.


Summaries of

Harris v. Department of Veterans Affairs

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Mar 29, 2006
Civil Action No. 05-492 (W.D. Pa. Mar. 29, 2006)
Case details for

Harris v. Department of Veterans Affairs

Case Details

Full title:LESTER H. HARRIS, Plaintiff, v. DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Mar 29, 2006

Citations

Civil Action No. 05-492 (W.D. Pa. Mar. 29, 2006)