From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Harris v. Crews

United States District Court, E.D. Kentucky, Southern Division at London
Dec 9, 2010
CIVIL ACTION NO. 10-199-KKC (E.D. Ky. Dec. 9, 2010)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 10-199-KKC.

December 9, 2010


ORDER


On July 20, 2010, Raymond Harris filed a pro se petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (DE 1). Consistent with local practice, this matter was referred to the United States Magistrate Judge for consideration.

On July 29, 2010, the Magistrate Judge gave the Petitioner forty-five (45) days to pay the required $5 filing fee for his petition (DE 2). When that period of time elapsed without payment of the fee or further filings from the Petitioner, the Magistrate Judge filed his proposed Report and Recommendation concluding that the petition should be dismissed without prejudice (DE 3). The Petitioner has not made any objections to the Magistrate Judge's findings.

Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED as follows:

(1) The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (DE 3) is ADOPTED as the opinion of this Court; and
(2) The petition for a writ of habeas corpus (DE 1) is DENIED and DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Nothing in this Order precludes the Petitioner from submitting a new habeas petition with payment of the filing fee or the in forma pauperis application.

So ordered this 9th day of December, 2010.


Summaries of

Harris v. Crews

United States District Court, E.D. Kentucky, Southern Division at London
Dec 9, 2010
CIVIL ACTION NO. 10-199-KKC (E.D. Ky. Dec. 9, 2010)
Case details for

Harris v. Crews

Case Details

Full title:RAYMOND HARRIS, PETITIONER v. COOKIE CREWS, WARDEN, KENTUCKY STATE…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Kentucky, Southern Division at London

Date published: Dec 9, 2010

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 10-199-KKC (E.D. Ky. Dec. 9, 2010)