From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Harris v. Colvin

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Jan 8, 2015
589 F. App'x 172 (4th Cir. 2015)

Opinion

No. 14-1786

01-08-2015

MARY HARRIS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant - Appellee.

Mary Harris, Appellant Pro Se. Craig Ormson, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.


UNPUBLISHED Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Stephanie A. Gallagher, Magistrate Judge. (1:13-cv-02503-SAG) Before MOTZ, KING, and WYNN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Mary Harris, Appellant Pro Se. Craig Ormson, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Mary Harris appeals the magistrate judge's order upholding the Commissioner's denial of Harris' applications for disability benefits and supplemental security income and the denial of her motion to alter or amend the judgment. We have reviewed the record and discern no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Harris v. Colvin, No. 1:13-cv-02503-SAG (D. Md. filed May 5, entered May 6, 2014; filed June 5, entered June 6, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

The parties consented to the jurisdiction of the magistrate judge. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (2012).

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

Harris v. Colvin

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Jan 8, 2015
589 F. App'x 172 (4th Cir. 2015)
Case details for

Harris v. Colvin

Case Details

Full title:MARY HARRIS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Jan 8, 2015

Citations

589 F. App'x 172 (4th Cir. 2015)

Citing Cases

Doswell v. Comm'r, Soc. Sec. Admin.

(Tr. 15) (emphasis added). Thus, instead of limiting Mr. Doswell to semi-skilled work, the ALJ precluded such…