From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Harris v. City of Akron

United States District Court, N.D. Ohio
Jun 25, 2024
5:23-CV-1290 (N.D. Ohio Jun. 25, 2024)

Opinion

5:23-CV-1290

06-25-2024

MICHAEL HARRIS, PLAINTIFF, v. CITY OF AKRON, et al., DEFENDANTS.


ORDER

JAMES S. GWIN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

Upon representation of counsel and parties that the above-captioned case has been settled between the parties, IT IS ORDERED that the docket be marked, "settled and dismissed with prejudice.”

Parties are to file any subsequent order setting forth different terms and conditions relative to the settlement and dismissal of the within action as directed. Any such order shall supersede this order.

FURTHER, the Court retains continuing jurisdiction to resolve disputes concerning the memorialization of this settlement agreement. See Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co., 511 U.S. 375 (1994).


Summaries of

Harris v. City of Akron

United States District Court, N.D. Ohio
Jun 25, 2024
5:23-CV-1290 (N.D. Ohio Jun. 25, 2024)
Case details for

Harris v. City of Akron

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL HARRIS, PLAINTIFF, v. CITY OF AKRON, et al., DEFENDANTS.

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Ohio

Date published: Jun 25, 2024

Citations

5:23-CV-1290 (N.D. Ohio Jun. 25, 2024)