From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Harris v. Caruso

United States District Court, W.D. Michigan, Northern Division
Jun 12, 2008
Case No. 2:08-cv-105 (W.D. Mich. Jun. 12, 2008)

Opinion

Case No. 2:08-cv-105.

June 12, 2008


ORDER


On June 4, 2008, this Court issued an Order For Service, in which plaintiff was ordered to provide the Court with 10 copies of the complaint for service upon the defendants. Plaintiff complied with this Court's order, but advised the Court that he intended to name only eight defendants in this action. It appears that plaintiff did not intend to name Unknown Clapp and Unknown Hart as defendants. Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk shall not issue summons for Unknown Clapp and Unknown Hart.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall terminate Unknown Clapp and Unknown Hart from the court record.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Harris v. Caruso

United States District Court, W.D. Michigan, Northern Division
Jun 12, 2008
Case No. 2:08-cv-105 (W.D. Mich. Jun. 12, 2008)
Case details for

Harris v. Caruso

Case Details

Full title:CURTIS HARRIS, Plaintiff, v. PATRICIA L. CARUSO, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Michigan, Northern Division

Date published: Jun 12, 2008

Citations

Case No. 2:08-cv-105 (W.D. Mich. Jun. 12, 2008)