From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Harris v. Brunk

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Nov 30, 2022
1:22-cv-0405 JLT HBK (PC) (E.D. Cal. Nov. 30, 2022)

Opinion

1:22-cv-0405 JLT HBK (PC)

11-30-2022

MARVIN HARRIS, Plaintiff, v. D. BRUNK, et al., Defendants.


ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO CLOSE THIS CASE (Doc. 10)

On October 11, 2022, the Court denied Plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) and ordered Plaintiff to pay the filing fee within 30 days. (Doc. 10.) Plaintiff was also informed the “failure to pay the required filing fee as ordered will result in the dismissal of this action without prejudice.” (Id. at 2, emphasis in original.) Despite this warning, Plaintiff failed to pay the filing fee, and the time to do so has expired. Accordingly, the Court ORDERS:

1. This action is DISMISSED without prejudice.

2. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Harris v. Brunk

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Nov 30, 2022
1:22-cv-0405 JLT HBK (PC) (E.D. Cal. Nov. 30, 2022)
Case details for

Harris v. Brunk

Case Details

Full title:MARVIN HARRIS, Plaintiff, v. D. BRUNK, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Nov 30, 2022

Citations

1:22-cv-0405 JLT HBK (PC) (E.D. Cal. Nov. 30, 2022)