From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Harris v. Brown

United States District Court, Western District of Louisiana
Oct 13, 2021
Civ. ACTION 3:21-01332 (W.D. La. Oct. 13, 2021)

Opinion

Civ. Action 3:21-01332

10-13-2021

ANTONIO HARRIS v. JACOB BROWN, ET AL.


KAYLA D. MCCLUSKY MAG. JUDGE.

JUDGMENT

TERRY A. DOUGHTY JUDGE.

The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge [Doc. No. 51] having been considered, no objections thereto having been filed, and finding that same is supported by the law and the record in this matter, IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the Rule 12(b) motions to dismiss for insufficient process, insufficient service of process, and/or lack of personal jurisdiction filed by Defendants, Jacob Brown [Doc. Nos. 19 & 46], Dakota DeMoss [Doc. No. 22], and George Harper [Doc. No. 24], are DENIED.


Summaries of

Harris v. Brown

United States District Court, Western District of Louisiana
Oct 13, 2021
Civ. ACTION 3:21-01332 (W.D. La. Oct. 13, 2021)
Case details for

Harris v. Brown

Case Details

Full title:ANTONIO HARRIS v. JACOB BROWN, ET AL.

Court:United States District Court, Western District of Louisiana

Date published: Oct 13, 2021

Citations

Civ. ACTION 3:21-01332 (W.D. La. Oct. 13, 2021)