From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Harris v. Bakeman

United States District Court, E.D. California
Apr 11, 2007
1:05-cv-01097-LJO-NEW-P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 11, 2007)

Opinion

1:05-cv-01097-LJO-NEW-P.

April 11, 2007


ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION (Doc. 21) ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER (Doc. 20)


David D. Harris ("Plaintiff"), a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 72-302.

On March 6, 2007, the Magistrate Judge filed Findings and Recommendation herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice to the parties that any objections to the Findings and Recommendation were to be filed within twenty (20) days. To date, the parties have not filed objections to the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 73-305, this Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the Findings and Recommendation to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendation, filed March 6, 2007, are ADOPTED IN FULL; and,

2. Plaintiff's Motion for Temporary Restraining Order, filed February 22, 2007, is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Harris v. Bakeman

United States District Court, E.D. California
Apr 11, 2007
1:05-cv-01097-LJO-NEW-P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 11, 2007)
Case details for

Harris v. Bakeman

Case Details

Full title:DAVID D. HARRIS, Plaintiff, v. BAKEMAN, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Apr 11, 2007

Citations

1:05-cv-01097-LJO-NEW-P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 11, 2007)