From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Harris v. Aetna Insurance Company

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Apr 10, 1968
208 So. 2d 282 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1968)

Opinion

No. 67-392.

March 12, 1968. Rehearing Denied April 10, 1968.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Dade County, Harold R. Vann, J.

Lane, French, Primm, Lane Carrier, Miami, for appellant.

Dixon, DeJarnette, Bradford, Williams, McKay Kimbrell and James A. Dixon, Jr., Knight, Underwood, Peters, Hoeveler Pickle, Miami, for appellees.

Before CHARLES CARROLL, C.J., and PEARSON and SWANN, JJ.


The appellant was the plaintiff in a declaratory decree action in which he sought to establish that his policies of insurance with the defendant-appellee were in effect on a day certain. The basis for the claimed coverage on the day designated was an alleged notification by telephone. The trial court found as a matter of fact that the phone call was not made. This finding is supported by evidence in the record. The judgment is therefore affirmed upon authority of Board of County Com'rs of Highlands County v. F.A. Sebring Realty Co., Fla. 1953, 63 So.2d 256; Highland Lakes, Inc. v. Art Present Real Estate, Inc., Fla.App. 1962, 147 So.2d 348, 349.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Harris v. Aetna Insurance Company

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Apr 10, 1968
208 So. 2d 282 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1968)
Case details for

Harris v. Aetna Insurance Company

Case Details

Full title:ALEXANDER G. HARRIS, APPELLANT, v. AETNA INSURANCE COMPANY, A CONNECTICUT…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Apr 10, 1968

Citations

208 So. 2d 282 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1968)

Citing Cases

Gaulden v. Arkwright-Boston Manufacturers Mutual Insurance

This allegation, denied by appellee, created an issue of fact that was properly submitted to the jury. See…