From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Harriot v. United States

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Nov 24, 2020
No. 20-7218 (4th Cir. Nov. 24, 2020)

Opinion

No. 20-7218

11-24-2020

MICHAEL OWEN HARRIOT, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. UNITED STATES, United States Marshals; UNKNOWN USM; UNKNOWN DEPUTY MARSHALS; FBI ROBERT WAIZENHOFER, Defendants - Appellees.

Michael Owen Harriot, Appellant Pro Se.


UNPUBLISHED

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Aiken. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., Senior District Judge. (1:20-cv-01266-JFA) Before WILKINSON, KING, and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Michael Owen Harriot, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Michael Owen Harriot appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on Harriot's complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971), and the Federal Torts Claims Act (FTCA), 28 U.S.C. §§ 1346(b), 2671-80. We agree with the district court's conclusion that Harriot's complaint was barred by the relevant statutes of limitations. Accordingly, we affirm the district court's order. Harriot v. United States, No. 1:20-cv-01266-JFA (D.S.C. Aug. 5, 2020). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

Harriot v. United States

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Nov 24, 2020
No. 20-7218 (4th Cir. Nov. 24, 2020)
Case details for

Harriot v. United States

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL OWEN HARRIOT, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. UNITED STATES, United…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Nov 24, 2020

Citations

No. 20-7218 (4th Cir. Nov. 24, 2020)