Opinion
No. 2:11-cv-01455 KJN.
September 28, 2011
ORDER
On September 26, 2011, the parties filed a "Joint Motion to Dismiss With Prejudice" pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). (Dkt. No. 14.) Although the parties' stipulation of dismissal was effective upon filing and without a court order pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), for the sake of clarity IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
See also Eitel v. McCool, 782 F.2d 1470, 1473 n. 4 (9th Cir. 1986); cf. United States v. Real Property Located at 475 Martin Lane, Beverly Hills, CA, 545 F.3d 1134, 1145-46 (9th Cir. 2008) (addressing the self-executing nature of dismissals under Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i)).
1. Pursuant to the parties' stipulation of dismissal (Dkt. No. 14), which is signed by all of the parties, this case is dismissed with prejudice.
2. The parties shall bear their own respective costs and expenses.
3. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case.
IT IS SO ORDERED.