From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Harrington v. Colvin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Mar 14, 1997
237 A.D.2d 992 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)

Opinion

March 14, 1997.

Order unanimously reversed on the law without costs, motion granted and complaint dismissed.

Present — Green, J.P., Pine, Callahan, Balio and Boehm, JJ.


Defendants contend that Supreme Court erred in denying their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that, as a matter of law, Linda J. Harrington (plaintiff) assumed the risk of injury inherent in tacking, or saddling, a show horse. We agree. Defendants established that plaintiff assumed the risk that the horse would bolt unexpectedly and that injury could result therefrom ( see, Rubenstein v Woodstock Riding Club, 208 AD2d 1160; Morrelli v Giordano, 206 AD2d 464, lv dismissed 85 NY2d 858; Hammond v Spruce Meadow Farm, 199 AD2d 1014). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Oswego County, Nicholson, J. — Summary Judgment.)


Summaries of

Harrington v. Colvin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Mar 14, 1997
237 A.D.2d 992 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
Case details for

Harrington v. Colvin

Case Details

Full title:LINDA J. HARRINGTON et al., Respondents, v. MARILYN COLVIN et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Mar 14, 1997

Citations

237 A.D.2d 992 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
656 N.Y.S.2d 1017

Citing Cases

Tilson v. Russo

The duty owed to participants under these circumstances "is a duty to exercise care to make the conditions as…

Norkus v. Scolaro

Supreme Court denied the summary judgment motions, which prompted this appeal. NYSSHA and CAS contend that…